Rachel in the World
Other Editions of This Title:
Praise For Rachel in the World: A Memoir…
“Jane Bernstein’s Rachel in the World is a remarkable book about tough love--about the many challenges of raising a child with special needs, and about the woeful inadequacy of terms like ‘special needs.’ It is a fearlessly honest book about disability and family life, in which children with disabilities are not heaven’s special angels, and in which children with disabilities grow up to be adults with disabilities. It is a necessary book, in which parents of children with disabilities worry about the world of social services and group homes and uncomprehending strangers. And it is a bracing book that reminds us how tough a parent’s love can be-- and how the power of love can sustain us in even the toughest times.”
“The battles and triumphs of motherhood are featured in Bernstein’s compelling account of life with Rachel. The honesty is apparent, as is the love, the pain, the hope—always the hope.”--Eva Feder Kittay, author of Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency
"Refreshingly unsentimental, wrenchingly candid sequel to the author’s previous memoir about her developmentally challenged daughter, Loving Rachel (1988). . . .A bracing testimony--not at all self-flattering--to parental love and advocacy."--Kirkus, July 15, 2007
University of Illinois Press, 9780252032530, 280pp.
Publication Date: August 13, 2007
About the Author
Conversation Starters from ReadingGroupChoices.com
In the introduction of RITW, Jane tells a mother of a 14 year old with developmental disabilities that she will never write a second book about Rachel. What does the mother mean when she says in response, “Oh, you will. You wait and see.”
Several times Jane mentions that in the not so distant past, families were encouraged to institutionalize children with mental retardation claiming it was “best for the family.” What do you think is “best” for a family? Did your opinion change after reading RITW? What does Jane seem to be saying?
In “Rachel Flies Alone,” Jane imagines Rachel talking to a busy stranger on a plane. What would you do if you were on the plane beside Rachel? Would you talk to her? For how long? What would you do if you wanted to sit quietly and she kept on talking?
What do you think is a stranger’s responsibility toward someone with disabilities?
In “Rachel at Work,” what does Jane learn about the nature of work and of her dreams for Rachel? Why is it so important to Jane that Rachel work?
Jane tells a county employee, “If I don’t get a placement for my daughter… I’ll leave her on the doorstep.” Did you believe Jane might someday do this? What do you think of her threat?
Wendy, the supports coordinator who helped find housing for Rachel said, “I do this because I care…” Do you think she was different from the other professionals? In what way?
When Jane mentions Kishorit, the Israeli community for adults with developmental disabilities, she often reminds the reader that it was beautiful but “separate.” Is a place like Kishorit better than options in the US such as lifesharing or group homes in the community? Should Jane have sent Rachel there?
Why was Jane so opposed to “lifesharing” as an option for Rachel. Do you think her feelings of guilt got in her way?
An interviewer asked Jane, “If the choice were yours, would you have chosen for Rachel not to be born?” In this era, where some disabilities can be detected early, this is a question parents are asked to consider. What do you think of the question? What choice would you make?
Many parents keep their sons and daughters with developmental disabilities at home instead of seeking independent living situations for them because they fear their adult children are too vulnerable to abuse. Do you think Jane failed to fully consider these risks? How does a parents work to prevent abuse?
Jane uses “retarded” and “mental retardation” which many people shun in favor of “special needs,” or developmental disabilities? Why does she use it? What effects do these labels have on individuals?
The word “honest” has been used by many readers and reviewers of RITW. What do you think they mean? Does Jane’s “honesty” help in telling the story or does it get in the way of the readers’ ability to see things for themselves?
The subtitle of Rachel in the World is “a memoir,” but Jane says relatively little about her life apart from Rachel. Why do you think she made those choices and to what effect
Jane quotes a decree from the United Nations that states that “All people have a right to choose how they want to spend their lives, including those with mental retardation.” Do you think Rachel had the chance to choose how she wanted to spend her life or did Jane’s values dominate?
Do you know anyone with developmental disabilities? How well? Have any of your attitudes changed since reading RITW?