Homeward Bound (Paperback)
Explaining Changes in Congressional Behavior
University of Pittsburgh Press, 9780822984993, 232pp.
Publication Date: October 15, 1986
Richard Fenno first coined the term home style to describe the ways in which members of Congress cultivate the voters of their home constituencies. He suggested that incumbents were paying more attention to their constituents than they had in the past. In this book, Glenn Parker examines the relationship between activities at home and in Washington, asking specifically: Why and when did congressmen and senators begin to pay more attention to their constituents? And what are the institutional consequences of this change?
Using data drawn from the travel vouchers filed by incumbent senators and congressmen between 1959 and 1980, Parker shows that since the mid-1960s incumbents have been placing greater emphasis on service to their state or district. Congress has facilitated this change in various ways, such as by increasing travel allowances and by scheduling that minimizes the conflict between legislative business in Washington and time spent with constituents.
Parker's study includes both the Senate and House, and he draws distinctions between the home-style behaviors of senators and representatives. He also provides a historical context for understanding the dynamics of changes in home style. The time-series data generate explanations that specify relationships among historical conditions, individual behavior, and institutional structures.
About the Author
Glenn R. Parker is Distinguished Professor of political science and professor of economics at Purdue University.
Praise For Homeward Bound: Explaining Changes in Congressional Behavior…
“The rich qualitative analysis of the 'home style' of a limited number of members of Congress by Richard Fenno has been supplemented by this systematic statistical study of change in the attentiveness of all members of the House and Senate for the period 1959-1980. . . . This book deserves a careful consideration by students of Congress.”
—Political Science Quarterly