October 2014 Indie Next List
— Brooke Alexander, Brazos Bookstore, Houston, TX
View the List
The hugely acclaimed New York Times Best Seller, now available in paperback!
*A National Book Critics Circle Award Finalist*
ONE OF THE BEST BOOKS OF 2014:
The New York Times Book Review (Top 10), Entertainment Weekly (Top 10), New York Magazine, Chicago Tribune (Top 10), Publishers Weekly (Top 10), Time Out New York (Top 10), Los Angeles Times, Kirkus, Booklist, NPR's Science Friday, Newsday, Slate, Refinery 29, and many more...
In this bold, fascinating book, Eula Biss addresses our fear of the government, the medical establishment, and what may be in our children's air, food, mattresses, medicines, and vaccines. Reflecting on her own experience as a new mother, she suggests that we cannot immunize our children, or ourselves, against the world. As she explores the metaphors surrounding immunity, Biss extends her conversations with other mothers to meditations on the myth of Achilles, Voltaire's Candide, Bram Stoker's Dracula, Rachel Carson's Silent Spring, Susan Sontag's AIDS and Its Metaphors, and beyond. On Immunity is an inoculation against our fear and a moving account of how we are all interconnected-our bodies and our fates.
Praise For On Immunity: An Inoculation…
“Subtle, spellbinding . . . Sontag said she wrote Illness as Metaphor to ‘calm the imagination, not to incite it,' and On Immunity also seeks to cool and console . . . [Biss] advances from all sides, like a chess player, drawing on science, myth, literature to herd us to the only logical end, to vaccinate.” —Parul Sehgal, The New York Times Book Review
“By exploring the anxieties about what's lurking inside our flu shots, the air, and ourselves, [Biss] drives home the message that we are all responsible for one another. On Immunity will make you consider that idea on a fairly profound level.” —Entertainment Weekly (Grade: A)
“On Immunity . . . weaves metaphor and myth, science and sociology, philosophy and politics into a tapestry rich with insight and intelligence.” —Jerome Groopman, The New York Review of Books
“A philosophical look at the history and practice of vaccination that reads like Joan Didion at her best. If you are yourself a nonfiction author, your initial response to this book might be to decide immediately on another line of work; Biss is that intimidatingly talented . . . .This is cultural commentary at its highest level, a searching examination of the most profound issues of health, identity and the tensions between individual parenting decisions and society.” —The Washington Post
“[An] elegant, intelligent and very beautiful book, which occupies a space between research and reflection, investigating our attitudes toward immunity and inoculation through a personal and cultural lens.” —Los Angeles Times
Graywolf Press, 9781555977207, 224pp.
Publication Date: September 15, 2015
About the Author
Conversation Starters from ReadingGroupChoices.com
1. On Immunity is dedicated to “other mothers,” and Biss refers to her conversations with “other mothers” throughout the book. Is On Immunity a book specifically for mothers? For all parents? For everyone?
2. In the beginning of On Immunity, Eula Biss is uncertain about whether or not to fully vaccinate her child, and some of the other mothers she consults in the book choose not to vaccinate their children. By the book’s end, Biss is decidedly pro-vaccination. How did she arrive at this position?
3. Why do you think Biss expresses empathy towards “anti-vaxxers”?
4. Biss states, “Those of us who draw on collective immunity owe our health to our neighbors” and “The health of our bodies always depends on choices other people are making.” Beyond vaccination, what choices do other people make that your health depends on?
5. As Biss writes, the people who choose not to vaccinate their children are “more likely to be white, to have an older married mother with a college education, and to live in a household with an income of $75,000 or more.” How is vaccination a class issue?
6. Have your opinions on vaccinations changed or shifted since reading the book? Why or why not?
7. How do the myths of Achilles and Narcissus help inform questions of individual responsibility vs. community responsibility? Why do you think Biss chose to begin the book with the myth of Achilles and end it with the myth of Narcissus?
8. Biss examines ways in which language relieves or reinforces our medical anxieties. Are there certain words or metaphors that have influenced how you approach your health care decisions?
9. Biss notes a historic association between vampires and vaccinations. She quotes author Eric Nuzum, who says: “If you want to understand any moment in time, or any cultural moment, just look at their vampires.” What do today’s portrayals of vampires say about our moment in time?