The Politics of Authenticity (Hardcover)
Radical Individualism and the Emergence of Modern Society
Verso, 9781844674411, 325pp.
Publication Date: November 1, 2009
Other Editions of This Title:
* Individual store prices may vary.
In this acclaimed exploration of the search for authentic individual identity, Marshall Berman explores the historical experiences and needs out of which this new radicalism arose. Focussing on eighteenth-century Paris, a time and place in which a distinctively modern form of society was just coming into its own, Berman shows how the ideal of authenticity of a self that could organize the individual's energy and direct it toward his own happiness articulated eighteenth-century man's deepest responses to this brave new world, and his most ardent hope for a new life in it. Exploring in particular the ideas of Montesquieu and Rousseau, Berman shows how the ideal of authenticity was radically opposed to the bourgeois, capitalistic idea of self-interest.
About the Author
Marshall Berman is Distinguished Professor of Political Science at City College of New York and CCNY Graduate Center, where he teaches political theory and urban studies. He writes frequently for "The Nation" and "The Village Voice," and serves on the editorial board of "Dissent." He is the author of "The Politics of Authenticity"; "All That Is Solid Melts into Air"; and "On the Town."
Praise For The Politics of Authenticity: Radical Individualism and the Emergence of Modern Society…
“Marshall Berman is one of our liveliest and most generous interpreters of Marx ... brimming with ideas and romance. He can help us learn to create ourselves while we try to change the world.”—The Nation
“Berman’s writing is scholarly but jargon-free, anchored in modern references but with a strong sense of history, and animated by a generous sympathy. He represents what’s best in the Marxist tradition.”—Christopher Hitchens, The Village Voice
“We must admire Marshall Berman’s audacity ... Berman persuasively argues that Marx’s theory of alienation can best explain the awful consequences of capitalism, even when workers toil at computers rather than assembly lines.”—The New York Times